ColumnMoney

Facing financial stress? Resist the urge to raid your 401(k)

Posted on 14 May 2008

Mark Miller
Mark Miller
Share
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

The economic downturn and mortgage crisis are turning a growing number of Americans into retirement account raiders.

The number of Americans tapping into their 401(k) savings accounts to pay debts or to fund other immediate financial needs rose sharply last year. The situation worsened during the first quarter this year as the mortgage crisis heated up, according to the Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America (PSCA), a non-profit group sponsored by companies that offer benefit plans.

The number of people making outright withdrawals from retirement accounts also is rising-in some ways an even more distressing trend than the growth in loans.

Borrowing from a 401(k) may seem attractive when your back is against the wall. Since you’re borrowing your own money, it’s one of the easiest forms of credit you can qualify for. And the interest rate will be lower than some other forms of consumer debt-typically prime plus one or two points.

But 401(k) loans can spell short-term financial trouble, and it’s a long-term threat to your retirement security. It should be the very last option you consider when you’re having financial difficulty, not the first.

The percentage of 401(k) participants who’ve borrowed from their accounts jumped to 18 percent last year from 11 percent in 2006, according to a survey by the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, a non-profit organization focused on retirement issues.

But if you look only at the employer-sponsored retirement plans that offer a loan option, the numbers are higher. About 25 percent of the people in those plans have a loan, according to the PSCA. The average loan amount is $8,000.

The most common reason for borrowing was to pay off non-mortgage consumer debt, Transamerica found, and to some extent was prompted by mortgage problems. Overall, debt pressure was cited by 49 percent of borrowers, up from 29 percent in 2006.

What kind of risk do these loans entail?

Your biggest worry should be job security. These loans have five-year terms; if you leave your job for any reason before then, you must repay in full-or the loan is treated as a taxable distribution. Plus, if you’re under age 59-1/2, you’ll pay a 10 percent penalty if you default on the loan. In today’s climate of mergers, reorganizations and layoffs, there’s plenty of reason to worry that you could get slammed with a distribution of penalty.

“In many ways, a 401k loan is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, because the risks are so significant,” says Catherine Collinson, president of the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies.

Hardship withdrawals have big drawbacks, too, and most experts aggressively discourage their use. The IRS only allows these withdrawals for limited and very specific purposes, including funding of medical expenses and funerals, paying mortgage debt or to avoid foreclosure or eviction.

The Internal Revenue Service requires employers to meet tough qualification requirements for approving hardship withdrawals, and employees must submit extensive documentation proving the hardship. “It’s the kind of information you might want to think twice about sharing with an employer,” says Collinson.

Then there’s the long-term damage to your retirement savings. Borrowing or withdrawing funds will inflict serious damage because of the time those funds won’t be earning investment returns. Also lost is the opportunity to earn returns on new investments; in most cases, you can’t make contributions while you have a loan outstanding, and you can’t contribute for six months after you make a hardship withdrawal.

I asked Transamerica to run some “what if” scenarios demonstrating just how much damage can be done. We worked with the example of a 35-year-old investor who plans to retire at 65, contributes $5,000 a year to a 401(k) account and has a current vested balance of $50,000.

You Loan hardship model minican download the what-if scenario here or by clicking on the image at left [pdf file].

But here’s a summary. If the money is left untouched, this investor would have $693,000 at retirement. Taking a $25,000 loan and repaying it over five years would reduce this investor’s account total at retirement to $576,000-a loss of 17 percent. The real killer would be a hardship withdrawal of $50,000; forced to start over with new contributions a year later, the investor would have just $378,000 at retirement-a whopping 45 percent reduction.

Do your homework carefully before jumping to the conclusion that a loan or withdrawal makes sense for you. Most of the big retirement saving companies can do a loan model for you to show you the impact.

Most important, take a deep breath and slow down. “When we’re under stress, it’s easy to have an impulsive reaction,” says Collinson. “Sit down and do your homework, and get a true picture of your overall financial situation. If you really are in a crunch and don’t feel you can solve it yourself, it’s worth the expense to get a reputable financial advisor to walk through it with you.”

Adds David Wray, PSCA president: “They key is that it should be the last choice, when you’ve exhausted every other possible option. If the problem is your mortgage, contact your lender and try to work out something; people everywhere are renegotiating and lenders don’t want to own houses. And if you have a job, you have some leverage.”


Related posts:

  1. Target funds facing Senate scrutiny
  2. Ten questions to ask when picking a financial planner
  3. Money and love: How successful couples split the financial chores
  4. Watch out for financial pitfalls of working past retirement age
  5. Employees want more on-the-job help with retirement plans

Tags | , , ,

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Jack Towarnicky Says:

    Simply, while your concerns are valid, your recommendation reminds me of “Just Say No”.

    As I currently live in Central Ohio, your column also reminded me of what Woody Hays might say if he compared loans to the forward pass - three things can happen when you take a loan, and two of them are bad:
    (1) Good - Borrow money, continue regular contributions, pay the loan back,
    (2) Bad - Take a loan, suspend contributions (and forego any company match) while repaying the loan, and
    (3) Really Bad - Same as #2, but fail to pay the loan back, recharacterize as a distribution, pay taxes and early withdrawal penalty (probably have to borrow more money to pay actual tax bill).

    Not sure why you believe:
    (1) Individuals who were responsible enough to save in the first place have now lost sight of their sacrifice,
    (2) Savers are ill-equipped or irresponsible borrowers,
    (3) Savers would suspend contributions & forego company match,
    (4) Savers who need money and access a 401(k) loan can easily obtain a similarly secured loan at the same interest rate,
    (5) The market rate of interest paid on a loan is less than a market rate on other fixed income investments in the plan.

    You state without qualification that “… If you leave your job for any reason .. you must repay the loan in full or the loan is treated as a taxable distribution. …” It just isn’t so.

    What you should recommend is that recordkeepers update loan processing to 21st Century standards - to help ensure loans will be repaid:
    (1) That contributions continue while a loan is being repaid,
    (2) That processing change to electronic methods so: (a) Repayments can continue after termination, and
    (b) New loans can be initiated after termination.
    (3) Recordkeepers adopt rollover provisions that facilitate moving outstanding loans to the new employer’s 401(k) plan.

    My 401(k) plan has had this 21st Century loan processing capability for over five years.

    Recent trends confirm most don’t borrow from a 401k. However, modest access and careful, deliberate use of loans can actually help people save for retirement. Research from the Boston College Center for Retirement Research shows savings often decline if access to money is limited. And, retirement preparation would be significantly enhanced if people saved more than they “earmark” for retirement - that is, access allows people to save more than what they would save solely for retirement. Then, when you borrow the money to meet a non-retirement need, and repay the loan, you rebuild the account for future use - ultimately retirement.

    The priority here should be to ensure loans are considerably more attractive than withdrawals and to update loan repayment processes to 21st Century standards.

    Finally, associates at my company who have loans not only tend to repay those loans, but their 2007 average contribution percentage is less than 1/2 of 1 percent lower than those who used 401k loans.

3 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Are 401(k) hardship withdrawals on the rise? | RetirementRevised Says:

    [...] outlined the reasons for avoiding hardship withdrawals if you possibly can back in [...]

  2. 50+Digital » Blog Archive » Are 401(k) hardship withdrawals on the rise? Says:

    [...] outlined the reasons for avoiding hardship withdrawals if you possibly can at RetirementRevised in [...]

  3. 50+Digital » Blog Archive » Companies cut back on 401(k) matches, employee borrowing jumps again Says:

    [...] doubt, the trend reflects the growing stress on household finances, but 401(k) borrowing can have devastating impact on long-term retirement account [...]

Leave a Reply

Follow Retirement Revised

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Follow the Retirement Twitter Feed
Super Beta Prostate Free Trial
Privacy Policy